Monday, June 07, 2010

When Declining to Trade Becomes "Price-Fixing"

Cultural use notwithstanding, the concept "monopoly" really only has meaning when it refers to people being prohibited from competition by force. And in today's semi-civilized world, that means government force. Unfortunately doctors are now joining other businessmen in learning what happens when concepts are flagrantly mis-used (see particularly the third paragraph):

First, until now the Federal Trade Commission, not the Justice Department, has taken the lead in prosecuting physicians. Since 2000, the FTC has brought about three dozen cases against physicians (all but one of which settled without any trial). But the FTC only has civil and administrative jurisdiction; the Antitrust Division has civil and criminal jurisdiction. The Sherman Act makes no distinction between civil and criminal “price fixing,” so in a case like this, it’s entirely a matter of prosecutorial discretion whether to charge the doctors with a civil or criminal offense.

Based on the descriptions in the Antitrust Division’s press release, there’s certainly no reason they couldn’t have prosecuted the doctors criminally and insisted upon prison sentences — and there’s little doubt such threats were made or implied to obtain the physicians’ agreement to the proposed “settlement.”

The second reason this is a landmark case is that the Justice Department has unambiguously stated that refusal to accept government price controls is a form of illegal “price fixing.”

The FTC has hinted at this when it’s said physicians must accept Medicare-based reimbursement schedules from insurance companies. But the DOJ has gone the final step and said, “Government prices are market prices,” in the form of the Idaho Industrial Commission’s fee schedule. The IIC administers the state’s worker compensation system and is composed of three commissioners appointed by the governor. This isn’t a quasi-private or semi-private entity. It’s a purely government operation.

The only permanent way to prevent these depredations is to correct the conceptual abuses that have been rampant for far too long (particularly for concepts relating to reason, egoism and capitalism).


Post a Comment

<< Home