Sunday, May 28, 2006

Ward Churchill Report

Diana over at Noodlefood has reprinted an editorial by Robert Pasnau on the Churchill scandal. It's worth reading the whole thing, but I particularly like this concise recap of Churchill's academic fraud:
In short, the committee found two cases where Churchill extensively plagiarized the work of others. They found other cases where he first wrote articles under a false name, and then in a later work cited those earlier articles as providing independent confirmation for his own claims. They found a great many places where apparently detailed footnotes turned out on close inspection to offer no support whatsoever for the claims being made, and found that Churchill continued to stick with these false sources in later work even after being confronted in print with their inadequacy. Assessing the cumulative impact of these tactics, the committee describes "a pattern and consistent research stratagem to cloak extreme, unsupportable, propaganda-like claims of fact that support Professor Churchill's legal and political claims with the aura of authentic scholarly research by referencing apparently (but not actually) supportive independent third-party sources."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home