Thrutch
Commentary from a pro-reason, pro-egoism, pro-capitalism perspective
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Ideas cannot be fought except by
means of better ideas. The battle
consists not of opposing, but of
exposing; not of denouncing
but of disproving; not of evading,
but of boldly proclaiming a full,
consistent and radical alternative.
-- Ayn Rand
Articles
Previous Posts
- Monty Python on Intelligent Design
- Capital Formation
- Froth in the Chinese Stock Market
- Protecting Us from Ourselves
- Global Warming Doubters
- TOFI
- Epidendrum 'Eternal Snow'
- Crossfit Rest Day Links
- EconTalk with John Allison
- Theocracy Watch: The Re-emergence of Religion in E...
Blog Roll
Regular
- ARI Editorials
- ARI's Voices For Reason
- Capitalism Magazine
- Gus Van Horn
- New Clarion
- Rational Capitalist
- Titanic Deck Chairs
- Undercurrent
Occasional
- Armchair Intellectual
- Art De Vany
- The Dougout
- FIRM
- George Reisman
- Global Warming Hysteria
- Instapundit
- Isaac Schrodinger
- Medworth
- Not PC
- OActivity
- Paul McKeever
- Repeal the Bailouts
- ReasonPharm
- Rule of Reason
- SEPP - The Week that Was
- Secular Foxhole
- Tim Blair
Jihadist Threat
- Caroline Glick
- Daniel Pipes
- Infidel Bloggers Alliance
- Jihad Watch
- Liberty and Culture
- Mark Steyn (Chicago Sun Times)
- Pedestrian Infidel
Other
Contributors
1 Comments:
Damn straight!! I was beginning to think I was the last person in Western Civilization who still deplored the use of "begging the question" to incorrectly mean "this question is begging to be asked". Even the WSJ has now misused it on its front page.
Three cheers for the Economist. When a word like "decimate" loses its precise definition and devolves into having a vague associative meaning connoting "destroy", the English language loses one more bit of conceptual clarity and precision of expression.
Post a Comment
<< Home