More on our Lapdog Media
It's good to see this point being made:
“We’ve had nine day of lies over what happened because they can’t dare say it’s a terrorist attack, and the press won’t push this,” said Caddell. “Yesterday there was not a single piece in The New York Times over the question of Libya. Twenty American embassies, yesterday, are under attack. None of that is on the national news. None of it is being pressed in the papers.”
Caddell added that it is one thing for the news to have a biased view, but “It is another thing to specifically decide that you will not tell the American people information they have a right to know.”
It's also good to see that fewer and fewer people (though still too many) care about the legacy media's claims and propaganda.
posted by Amit Ghate at 11:41 AM
3 Comments:
It's also good to see that fewer and fewer people (though still too many) care about the legacy media's claims and propaganda.
don't you mean
It's also good to see that more and more people (though still too few) care about the legacy media's claims and propaganda.
?
I meant the content of the claims and propaganda (i.e. taking them at face value). I wasn't getting at the meta issue of caring that the media is engaging in propaganda. But you're right, it wasn't clear and I should be more careful about that in the future.
I agree. As time goes by, There will be more people who will care and think about the legacy media's claims and propaganda. It takes time.
used cisco
Post a Comment
<< Home